Experience The World is Flat (a)

 Finished, spent nearly 10 hours, that's enough I do a lot of things. Moreover, the small cabin space, the traditional seat also makes a more comfortable and I can not act, but to study. that reading? like a long time, decided to take on to know that the book's core ideas as the goal, so that when people refer to this book appears to fall behind when their Buzhi Yu. The second movement began to promote learning over a long flat blue (Blue Ocean, the Long Tail, The World is Flat), when themselves and from the bookcase out these three books, read it carefully to find the development to fit with China Mobile's point. Therefore, it is relatively brief time twice, but did not fully appreciate its meaning. and this time, and still the way to go abroad, would not God want me to re-read the book? so will their views and ideas, combined with the European study and experience to write something after. originally intended to be published in such return, Friends do not live up to the expectations of the majority of Bo, the results to the hotel after seeing the cable, the hearts of himself, despite the 0.4 pounds per minute (about 6 ¥) Internet access fees, or come up.
on the plane after Experience is not the same, this time to do the upgrade, I had to experience business class. Air on a modified Airbus 340 business class and I imagine a big difference, once in the advertising and promotion can be seen in a single flat lying on the seat in front of me, of course, first class is more advanced, more comfortable. in the meal, we began to read the seat in the flat flat world, the hearts of thinking, so a comfortable environment and conditions, is not more likely to make the world flatter?
flat world is from Bangalore, India, to begin with, an executive from the mouth of INFOSYS. In the case of the growing globalization of outsourcing, the advanced means of communication to a large number of routine tasks are outsourced to India, which gives workers in Europe and America to great pressure, and this book begins with the interpretation and advocacy, in this way the benefits to society and individuals should take attitude. We are now out of the era of information explosion, but think about it, the information we collect how much value? paper, the author cited several examples, such as the media industry is to outsource the content of a large number of transactional outsourcing, and let reporter tracking the core of things, to play its value; access to information and analysis within the army, the power of information can break the traditional hierarchy, in order to improve efficiency. this is more validation that I said the word: now their competitiveness is not reflected in the information gathering ability, but ability to judge the accuracy of the information and the extraction efficiency. Our access to the vast amounts of information around, probably most, are those who have been outsourced collection, analysis, reporting and delivery, and value is not high, and who from the mass of information quickly, efficiently and accurately identify the core values, his efficiency, competence will be outstanding; and this ability is gradually accumulated through time and event validation. could get in Globalization 3.0 Age invincible.
main driving globalization evolution from the state to the company, to globalization, after 3.0 has been changed to the individuals. flat world is certainly encourage innovation, but can not ignore the world and the community on stifle innovation, that is, we can not only see the positive environment for innovation, but also see the strength of barriers to innovation mm mergers and acquisitions sometimes there is a barrier to innovation. ORACLE few days before the acquisition of BEA in the fried things also led to the years I look back at the merger between the phenomenon of IT vendors. The reason analysis of mergers and acquisitions, is also associated with globalization, because after all, is the promoter of globalization 2.0. recall that IBM acquired INFOMAIX, I had to sigh because, although IBM said that eggs. After the acquisition of the IBM, ORACLE and hold high the banner of the acquisition, first eat the PORTAL, PEOPLESOFT, after eating SIEBEL, and then expand out into the hands of the BI field, acquired HIPERION. if I did not mention is the hostile takeover, but just a few years time, the industry's only CRM software suite is almost the only choice. So to counter ORACLE, SAP has eaten BO; to expand IT support systems in the telecom product line, AMDOCS acquired CRAME; HP COMPAQ quiet for some time to digest and, more recently came the news of the acquisition of BEA or Kodak. were too busy capital operation, owners and employees eager to consider their own way and the fate of all day care or be acquired after the acquisition of its own job problems, who considered innovation? those innovations, there is a unique technology companies, under the big stick in the capital surrendered, and many people confused: The purpose of innovation is to give yourself a better price? This phenomenon does have a serious impact innovation.
why the implementation of corporate mergers and acquisitions? I'm not good at this, consultants and experts who want to do a joke, I'm just saying that their superficial understanding that Baotuan heating, increasing cost pressures in the company, profit more and more thin, flat channel more and more cases, the cost of innovation to the enterprise too much pressure, as a direct acquisition of its own input, which is the cause of many cases of mergers and acquisitions . M & A is the beginning of oligarchy, oligopoly on the one hand can save costs, while improving their bargaining power, when no choice of products on the market when the bargaining position of both parties had changed.
What innovation monopoly enterprises will ? the answer is yes. from a single enterprise view, good companies will use their resources and relaxed living environment, advances in technology, innovation, large-scale investment, to promote social progress and technological evolution, especially a lot of basic research is the need for huge financial support. But on the other hand, industry specializing in surgery, not necessarily by the company this innovative hands-on, such as the Bill. Gates, by way of investment, so that the right people at the right conditions conduct research and innovation, I think this is reasonable, at least do more than Microsoft's own medical research and development, or build a strong medical research for innovation.